The Complete Insurance Denial Code Library — What Every Code Means
The ClaimCompass Denial Code Library translates every major insurance denial code and tells you exactly what to do.
A peer-to-peer review can overturn a denial in days — before a formal appeal is ever filed. Here is how.

A peer-to-peer review is a direct conversation between your ordering physician and the insurer's medical reviewer. It is one of the most powerful — and least used — tools available when a clinical service is denied.
Unlike a formal written appeal, a peer-to-peer review happens by phone, often within days of the denial. Your physician explains the clinical rationale directly to the insurer's reviewer. No forms. No waiting months. Many denials are overturned before a formal appeal is ever filed.
Peer-to-peer reviews are most effective for:
They are less useful for administrative denials — wrong codes, missing information, timely filing issues — where the dispute is not clinical.
Most insurers allow peer-to-peer requests within a short window after the denial — typically 5 to 14 days. Check your denial notice for the specific timeframe.
Your denial notice or EOB will include a phone number for physician services or peer-to-peer reviews. If it is not listed, call the main provider services line and ask specifically for the peer-to-peer review department.
The peer-to-peer review is a physician-to-physician conversation. Your ordering physician — not you — must call. The insurer will not conduct a peer-to-peer review with a patient.
Before the call, your physician should review your complete medical record, the denial reason and clinical criteria applied, and any published guidelines supporting the medical necessity of the denied service.
After the peer-to-peer review, ask for the insurer's decision in writing. If the service is approved, confirm the authorization number before proceeding.
Your physician's goal on the call is to establish threthings:
The conversation should reference the insurer's own clinical criteria and demonstrate how the patient's case meets those criteria — not argue that the criteria are wrong.
If the peer-to-peer review results in an upheld denial, file a formal written appeal immediately. The peer-to-peer discussion gives you valuable information — you now know exactly what the insurer's reviewer believes is missing from the case. Address those specific points in your formal appeal.
ClaimCompass generates your formal written appeal letter after a failed peer-to-peer review, addressing the specific clinical arguments the reviewer raised.
Upload your denial at myclaimcompass.ai for a free analysis.
No. A peer-to-peer review is informal and happens before a formal appeal is filed. It does not affect your appeal rights or deadlines — you can still file a formal appeal after a peer-to-peer review if the denial is upheld.
No. Continue tracking your appeal deadline even while a peer-to-peer review is pending. If the review is not resolved quickly, file your formal appeal to protect your rights.