ClaimCompass

You found the right place. We’ll read the letter, explain it in plain English, and tell you what to do next.

Free in about 30 seconds →
How It Works Pricing Resources

Types of claims

Health & medical

Health Insurance Appeal Medical Bill Dispute Medicare Appeal Mental Health Appeal Prior Authorization Appeal Dental & Vision Appeal DME Appeal Private Disability / ERISA Appeal Analyze my letter — free
Health & Medical

You found the right place.

Your Dental or Vision Claim Was Denied. Here's How to Appeal.

The letter you have

Crown denied. Implant rejected. Braces excluded. A vision procedure your plan was supposed to cover. Dental and vision denials are common — and the exclusion is often applied to the wrong code, or the wrong date.

At stake: $200 – $8,000

What we do with it

We read the letter. We explain it in plain English. In about 30 seconds you’ll know where you stand — and what to do next.

Analyze My Denial — Free →

No account needed · Results in about 30 seconds · Free to start

Coverage Exclusions Must Be Explicitly Stated — and Correctly Applied

Dental and vision insurers frequently cite exclusions that are either not clearly written in your policy, applied to the wrong procedure code, or based on frequency limits calculated from the wrong date. Before accepting any dental or vision denial, review the exact exclusion language in your plan documents. If it is ambiguous — it should be interpreted in your favor.

What Does a High Viability Score Mean?

A score above 70 means you have a solid case worth pursuing. A score of 90 or higher — which we see frequently in dental frequency limit cases where the insurer used the wrong service date — means the denial has a clear factual error that must be corrected on appeal.

90–100Clear factual error — frequency date wrong or exclusion misapplied
70–89Solid case — medical necessity or exclusion language grounds
50–69Possible — depends on plan language and clinical documentation

Three Common Dental and Vision Denials — and Why They Are Overturnable

These are the situations we see most often. Every one has real grounds to challenge.

Crown & Restorative

82 Viability

Your dental crown, filling, or major restorative procedure was denied — often as "not medically necessary" or for exceeding frequency limits.

"This claim has been denied. The requested procedure exceeds the plan's covered frequency limit of once per tooth per five years. Last service date on record: [date]."

Why it overturns: Frequency limit denials are among the most commonly incorrect dental denials. Insurers calculate frequency from the wrong service date, apply limits across insurance carriers that don't share records, or use outdated plan year dates. Request the specific date they used to calculate the frequency window and compare it to your actual treatment history. Additionally, if the clinical need has changed since the last procedure — new decay, fracture, or structural failure — a medical necessity argument can override the frequency limit entirely with supporting X-rays and a dentist's clinical note.

Orthodontia · Braces

78 Viability

Orthodontic treatment — braces, Invisalign, or appliances — was denied as cosmetic or as exceeding your lifetime orthodontia maximum.

"Orthodontic treatment has been denied. This procedure is considered cosmetic and does not meet the plan's medical necessity criteria for covered orthodontia benefits."

Why it overturns: The "cosmetic only" determination is frequently wrong when documented functional issues exist. Severe skeletal misalignment, crossbites causing jaw pain, crowding causing decay or periodontal disease, impacted teeth requiring surgical intervention — these are medical necessity grounds that override cosmetic exclusions. Your orthodontist's clinical records documenting the functional impairment, not just aesthetics, are the critical evidence. For lifetime maximum disputes, verify whether the orthodontia benefit was applied in a prior plan year under a different carrier — those records are often unavailable to the current insurer and may not count against your limit.

Vision & Refractive

75 Viability

Vision correction — glasses, contacts, or refractive procedures — was denied as excluded, not medically necessary, or exceeding frequency limits.

"Your vision claim has been denied. Prescription eyewear benefits are limited to once every 24 months. Your last benefit was utilized within the coverage period."

Why it overturns: Vision frequency limit calculations are wrong almost as often as dental ones. Verify the exact date your insurer used — mistakes in recording the prior service date are extremely common, particularly when switching insurers. For prescription changes driven by a medical condition (diabetes affecting vision, post-surgical refractive change, rapid prescription change requiring new lenses before the frequency window) — a medical necessity exception is available. For refractive surgery (LASIK, PRK) denials, verify whether your plan explicitly excludes refractive procedures or simply has no benefit — these are different and the first may be challengeable if functional impairment is documented.

Here's How It Works — Three Simple Steps

From denial letter to appeal-ready in about 3 minutes. No dental or insurance expertise required.

1

Upload Whatever You Received

Take a photo or upload a PDF — that's really all it takes.

2

We Read It and Explain It

Within seconds — frequency errors caught, exclusion language analyzed.

3

Your Complete Appeal Letter Is Ready

Formally written, benefit language cited, ready to send — for $39.

How to appeal a dental or vision insurance denial — start free

Upload your dental or vision denial. In under a minute, you'll know whether a frequency error was made, whether the exclusion applies, and exactly what to do next.

Start My Free Analysis →

Free to analyze · $39 complete appeal · No subscription · All escalation levels included

You don’t have to figure this out alone.

Analyze my letter — free